Feedback perceptions of first year medical residents: An intervention-based survey study.

BACKGROUND: Feedback in residency is a necessity for progression toward clinical competency and is included in The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) milestones as an essential component for accreditation. PURPOSE: Our study elucidates perceptions of feedback of first-year residents and aims to identify how these perceptions change after education on building expertise through deliberate practice. METHODS: First-year internal medicine and neurology residents of a mid-sized university-affiliated residency program answered a five-question 5-point unipolar response scale questionnaire regarding feedback perceptions before and after attending a workshop about building expertise through effective feedback during residency orientation. Related-Samples Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was applied for comparing pre- versus post-questionnaire data. RESULTS: Of 31 first-year residents, 29 completed the pre-questionnaire for a completion rate of 93.5%, while 24 of 31 completed the post-questionnaire for a completion rate of 77.4%. Of the five questions, three improved when comparing pre and post responses to, including the questions on confidence in the ability to procure feedback (p = <0.001), the effort put into procuring feedback (p = 0.001), and frequency of seeking feedback (p = 0.002). Interest in receiving feedback and the importance of feedback remained unchanged after workshop attendance. CONCLUSION: Residents should be educated on building expertise through deliberate practice and how to obtain high-quality feedback, given the emphasis and essentiality of feedback within the milestone assessment system and the core competencies of ACGME. In our study, education on these topics led to significant improvement in resident perceptions of confidence in the ability to procure feedback, effort put into procuring feedback, and frequency at which feedback would be sought.

The House Cup: Using Longitudinal Gamification to Improve Didactic Attendance.

OBJECTIVE: Determine if a point-based attendance system combined with longitudinal gamification is feasible and improves didactic session attendance and learner perceptions at our internal medicine residency. METHODS: A prospective before-after cohort study. Weekly attendance was tracked from June 2022 through April 2023 at our university-affiliated internal medicine residency program. We implemented a point-based longitudinal game incentivizing residents to attend didactics with positive reinforcement in July 2022 (C: carrot). We added tiered positive reinforcement and positive punishment to the game in January 2023 (CS: carrot and stick). Attendance during these periods was compared to pre (P) and postintervention (S). Perceptions were assessed during the P, C, and CS periods with Likert scale ratings. RESULTS: CS was associated with higher attendance than other study periods (P = .002). Median attendance was P-51% (IQR 37.5-64.5), C-65% (IQR 50-74), CS-81% (IQR 78-94), and S-66% (IQR 63-71). Perceptions were similar during pre and intervention study periods, including perceptions of camaraderie (P-4.4, C-4.4, CS-4.5; P = .56), interest in attending didactic sessions (P-3.7, C-3.4, CS-3.2; P = .21), and mandate as the primary reason for attending didactics (P-3.1, C-3.1, CS-3.2; P = .96). CONCLUSIONS: A point-based attendance system combined with a longitudinal game that included tiered positive reinforcement and positive punishment was feasible and associated with higher didactic attendance but not associated with changes in resident perceptions.

Confidence and Utilization are Poorly Associated with Point-of-Care Ultrasound Competency among Internal Medicine Trainees.

INTRODUCTION: Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) is the utilization of bedside ultrasound by clinicians. Its portable and rapid diagnostic capabilities make it an excellent tool for deployment and mobile military settings. However, formal and uniform POCUS training is lacking. Furthermore, the evaluation of these curricula often relies on confidence assessment. Our objective was to assess the relationships between confidence, frequency of utilization, and image interpretation knowledge among our Internal Medicine residents before and after the implementation of a formal curriculum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In November 2020, we implemented a longitudinal, flipped-classroom, academic half-day curriculum, conducting a prospective before-after cohort evaluation of its implementation. The POCUS curriculum was implemented as a longitudinal, asynchronous, flipped-classroom activity with workshop sessions during one academic half-day per month. We measured confidence via a Likert scale and utilization frequency via a five-point scale. Six multiple-choice questions (MCQ) with ultrasound videos assessed image interpretation competency. The image interpretation score was reported as percent correct. We related confidence and utilization to the image interpretation score. RESULTS: Ninety-nine residents were eligible for participation. Fifty-four (55%) completed a pre-curriculum assessment and 45 (45%) completed a post-curriculum assessment. Average image interpretation scores were 41% pre-curriculum and 51% post-curriculum (P =0.02). Pre-curriculum residents were on average unconfident (mean=2.56), and post-curriculum residents were on average confident (mean=3.62). Pre-curriculum residents used POCUS occasionally (mean=2.02, count 13 (24%) never utilizing). Post-curriculum residents used POCUS occasionally (mean=2.42, count 4 (9%) never utilizing). Pre- and post-curriculum confidence were not significantly associated with image interpretation scores (pre-curriculum: r=-0.10, P =0.50; post-curriculum: r=0.24, P =0.11). Pre- and post-curriculum utilization were not significantly associated with image interpretation scores (pre-curriculum: r=0.15, P =0.28; post-curriculum: r=0.02, P =0.90). The number of curriculum sessions attended was significantly associated with higher image interpretation scores (r=0.30, P =0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that POCUS confidence and informal utilization do not correlate with image interpretation knowledge on MCQs among Internal Medicine residents. These findings support assessing direct measures of knowledge, rather than confidence, as an endpoint in evaluating POCUS curricula among Internal Medicine residents.

Novel In-Training Evaluation Report in an Internal Medicine Residency Program: Improving the Quality of the Narrative Assessment.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether incorporating our novel in-training evaluation report (ITER), which prompts each resident to list at least three self-identified learning goals, improved the quality of narrative assessments as measured by the Narrative Evaluation Quality Instrument (NEQI). METHODS: A total of 1468 narrative assessments from a single institution from 2017 to 2021 were deidentified, compiled, and sorted into the pre-intervention form arm and post-intervention form arm. Due to limitations in our residency management suite, incorporating learning goals required switching from an electronic form to a hand-deliver form. Comments were graded by two research personnel utilizing the NEQI's scale of 0-12, with 12 representing the maximum quality for a comment. The outcome of the study was the mean difference in NEQI score between the electronic pre-intervention period and paper post-intervention period. RESULTS: The mean NEQI score for the pre-intervention period was 2.43 ± 3.34, and the mean NEQI score for the post-intervention period was 3.31 ± 1.71, with a mean difference of 0.88 (p < 0.001). In the pre-intervention period, 46% of evaluations were submitted without a narrative assessment (scored as a zero) while 1% of post-intervention period evaluations had no narrative assessment. Internal consistency reliability, as measured by Ebel's intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), showed high agreement between the two raters (ICC = 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that implementing a timely, hand-delivered paper ITER that incorporates resident learning goals can lead to overall higher-quality narrative assessments.

Implementation and Evaluation of a Longitudinal Flipped-Classroom Point-of-Care Ultrasound Curriculum at an Internal Medicine Residency Program.

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has extensive clinical utility in internal medicine, but formal and uniform curricula in internal medicine are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of a longitudinal, flipped-classroom, academic half-day curriculum on internal medicine resident confidence, utilization, and changes in clinical management. METHODS: We implemented an asynchronous, flipped-classroom, academic half-day curriculum from November 2020 to November 2021 and conducted an evaluation with a prospective, before-after cohort study. Curriculum included 4 rotating sessions comprised of 20 to 30 min of image interpretation followed by 1.5 to 2 h of image acquisition. Confidence was rated via Likert scale. Utilization was reported via indicating never, 1 to 2, 3 to 4, 5 to 6, or >6 times per month (recorded as 1-5, respectively). Image interpretation was assessed via a 6-question, multiple-choice video assessment. RESULTS: Nineteen of 99 potential residents (19%) completed a pre- and post-curriculum evaluation. Residents attended a median of 4 sessions. Confidence improved from 2.47 to 3.53 (P = .002). Utilization did not improve overall (2.11-2.42, P = .22), but utilization of left ventricular function assessment (1.53-2.00, P = .046) and pulmonary assessment (1.53-2.00, P = .039) increased. The percentage of residents that had ever changed their clinical management by POCUS increased from 47% to 84% after implementation of the curriculum. Cardiac, pulmonary/pleural, volume assessment, and abdominal free fluid exams were reported as the most clinically useful. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a longitudinal, academic half-day curriculum for POCUS resulted in improved confidence, increased POCUS utilization for the cardiac and pulmonary examination, and changes in clinical management based on POCUS.

A Case of Primary Epstein-Barr Virus Infection Masquerading As Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms.

In this case report, we discuss the diagnostic dilemma presented by a patient admitted for elevated liver enzymes and rash, who had a history of recent amoxicillin use. This presentation initially appeared to fit the criteria for Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) syndrome. However, histologic evaluation determined the rash was consistent with Miliaria rubra rather than the lymphocytic infiltrate of DRESS. This necessitated broad diagnostic testing to determine the underlying etiology of the patient's syndrome. Serology subsequently demonstrated primary Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) infection, which explained her acute liver injury. Her eosinophilia was potentially related to an allergic reaction to surgical tape but was never definitely diagnosed. This case demonstrates the importance of maintaining a wide differential even when clinical diagnostic criteria are apparently met.

Addressing Persistent Vaccine Hesitancy in a Military Community Through a Physician-Led Intervention.

INTRODUCTION: Following the identification of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China, the virus has spread rapidly around the world causing severe illness and death. Several vaccines were found to be safe and effective and made available first to those most at risk and then to the general public. Despite the safety and efficacy profiles, vaccine hesitancy remains a significant barrier to widespread immunity. Within the military community at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, we provided multiple physician-led educational seminars to address vaccination concerns and decrease vaccine hesitancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors presented a PowerPoint presentation of the available vaccinations, their safety data, and efficacy, followed by a town hall-style question-and-answer period where questions were presented from the previous submission, as well as real-time submissions through Facebook Live. The questions were fielded by specialists in Internal Medicine, Infectious Disease, Pulmonary-Critical Care, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Rheumatology. The entire presentation was streamed through Facebook Live and was freely available. Following the presentation, an online survey was provided for willing participants to complete which included demographic data and addressed their previous and current attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccinations and their opinions on the presentation. Data from the survey were then analyzed through IBM SPSS Statistics 25.0 to find any associations or risk factors for hesitancy. RESULTS: There were 73 respondents to the assessment, most of which were nonmedical. Of the 73, the majority (45) had already received a vaccine for COVID-19. Of those unvaccinated, 17 did not want a vaccination before or after the seminar. Two did change their mind about being receptive to vaccination, and one changed from receptive to hesitant. The only statistically significant risk factors for vaccine hesitancy were those with a moderate to great amount of trust in their health care provider compared to those with little to no trust (73% vs. 4%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our intervention was limited in its effectiveness to address vaccine hesitancy late in the pandemic, with our study limited by our small sample size. Regardless, it identified a peculiar discrepancy with those with the most trust in health care providers being the most likely to be vaccine-hesitant. This highlights the importance of the information that trusted health care providers are providing to their patients and may identify more effective routes to address vaccine hesitancy in the future.

Severe Urinary Retention Resulting in Extreme Post-obstructive Diuresis and Decompressive Hematuria.

Post-obstructive diuresis and decompressive hematuria are rare but potentially serious complications of severe urinary retention. This is a case report of a 73-year-old patient with undiagnosed severe large-volume urinary retention who developed extreme cases of both complications after presenting with progressive weight gain, lower extremity edema, worsening dyspnea, and new-onset urinary incontinence. Upon further evaluation, the patient was determined to have acute renal failure, bilateral hydroureteronephrosis, a severely distended urinary bladder, and an enlarged prostate. Foley catheterization produced 5.9 L of urinary output with initial placement. He required prolonged hospitalization for hemodynamic monitoring requiring fluid resuscitation, serial electrolyte monitoring requiring repletion, acute blood loss anemia requiring four units of red blood cell transfusion, continuous bladder irrigation, three cystoscopies under anesthesia, and intravesicular fibrinolysis inhibitor instillations. This case illustrates an extreme severity of post-obstructive diuresis and decompressive hematuria in chronic urinary retention that has not been previously described in the literature.

Examining the initial prescription leading to long-term opioid use at a military medical treatment facility.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic pain is common in the military, and over a quarter of active-duty military members have received a prescription for opioids. This study reviewed the initial opioid prescription among those who became future long-term users at an Air Force base in the United States and reports the characteristics of the provider and patient. METHODS: Our single-center retrospective study evaluated initial opioid prescriptions leading to long-term use within the military's electronic medical record at a large military medical treatment facility including active-duty patients and veterans. Of the 3,701 charts reviewed, 348 patients met the inclusion criteria for the long-term opioid use. RESULTS: Older patient groups received a higher initial amount of opioids than younger groups (p = 0.007). Primary care outpatient clinics started 43 percent of initial long-term opioid users, while surgical specialties contributed to 34 percent of the sample. In our study, 35.9 percent of the long-term opioid users were given their first opioid prescription within 30 days of an operation. Veterans or those separated from the military were less likely to have a behavioral disorder than active duty or family members. CONCLUSIONS: Our sample mirrored the civilian population in terms of age, gender, and most common pain diagnosis. We found that older patients initially received a higher dispensed amount compared to our younger patients. There was a concerning trend for surgical patients to develop into chronic opioid users.

Non-toxic Megacolon Secondary to High-Grade Large-Bowel Obstruction.

A 92-year-old male presented from an outside hospital for treatment of a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation (COPD) and subsequently developed worsening abdominal distention with pain during the course of his hospitalization. He was found to have a high-grade large-bowel obstruction with a dilated colon of 20 cm measuring upward. The patient ultimately underwent a hemicolectomy to prevent bowel ischemia and reformation of another volvulus. We present this case to elucidate the need for vigilant monitoring in patients with chronic bowel obstruction due to lack of typical symptoms, to demonstrate a successful management approach, and to exhibit an extreme example of the resulting megacolon.

Bamlanivimab Use in a Military Treatment Facility.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), was first identified in 2019 in Wuhan, China, and has rapidly spread across the world. As of April 2021, SARS-CoV-2 has infected more than 140,000,000 and caused more than 3,000,000 deaths globally. In November 2020, the monoclonal antibody bamlanivimab was approved by the FDA for non-hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) who possessed risk factors for progression to severe COVID-19. This provided a treatment option that may help prevent hospitalization. METHODS: Patients who regularly received ambulatory care at a military treatment facility and who were diagnosed with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 and possessed risk factors for progression to severe COVID-19 were treated with a single, intravenous infusion (700 mg) of the virus-neutralizing monoclonal antibody bamlanivimab. The primary outcome was improvement of self-reported symptoms within 24 to 72 hours of receiving the infusion. The secondary outcome was prevention of disease progression requiring emergency department (ED) utilization or hospitalization related to COVID-19 within 30 days of infusion. Bamlanivimab was administered in accordance with the FDA's approval and Defense Health Agency's guidance, including follow-up within 72 hours of administration. Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was obtained. RESULTS: Of the COVID-19 patients who were given the option of a bamlanivimab infusion, 40 accepted and 6 did not (40/46, 86.9%). Thirty-six of 40 patients in the treatment group were contacted within 72 hours. ED/hospitalization information was available for all 46 patients. In the treatment group, 94.4% (34/36) reported global improvement. Three of 40 (7.5%) patients in the treatment group required inpatient admission, and 2 of 40 patients (5%) required ED evaluation within 30 days of infusion. Therefore, 5 of 40 (12.5%) patients required evaluation shortly after infusion, while 2 of 6 (33.3%) patients who declined treatment required hospital evaluation or admission related to COVID-19 within 30 days of infusion (P = .15). CONCLUSIONS: Global improvement of symptoms within 24 to 72 hours of infusion was reported by 94.4% of patients receiving bamlanivimab; however, statistical significance could not be determined due to the small sample size and lack of placebo group due to study design. Furthermore, ED visits and hospital admissions were analyzed, but with only six patients in the comparison group, the relative risk was not statistically significant and could not be precisely estimated. In the future, this study can be replicated with both larger control/treatment arms to validate the initial results of this small, retrospective, cohort study.

Perceptions and Concerns Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination in a Military Base Population.

INTRODUCTION: Safe and effective vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus 2 are essential tools in the fight against the coronavirus disease 2019  (COVID-19) pandemic. However, hesitancy to vaccination is a major barrier to achieving herd immunity, particularly among a population working on a military base. To better understand the perceptions and concerns of these individuals, a voluntary survey was conducted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An interactive, online survey was constructed and disseminated to individuals associated with Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (WPAFB) in Dayton, OH. Survey participation was voluntary with responses collected over the initial weeks in which WPAFB began to distribute COVID-19 vaccines in a series of phases. Although initially designed to collect demographic data and identify reasons for potential vaccine hesitancy among WPAFB 88th Medical Group personnel, the study population was expanded to include all WPAFB-affiliated personnel at the direction of base leadership. The chi-squared test was used to examine the relationships between categorical variables, while multivariable logistic regression was used to assess age and occupation as independent risk factors for vaccine hesitancy. RESULTS: A total of 816 individuals completed the survey, of whom 22.7% (n = 185) self-identified as vaccine hesitant (VH). The VH group had a lower mean age than the not vaccine hesitant (NVH) group (39.3 ± 14.2 vs. 45.9 ± 13.4, P < .001). Respondents whose occupation was medical were more likely to be VH than their non-medical colleagues (49% vs. 18%, P < .001). The VH group was more concerned about short-term side effects (43% vs. 26%, P < .001), long-term side effects (82% vs. 50%, P < 0.001), vaccine effectiveness (23% vs. 5%, P < .001), vaccine making them feel sick (22% vs. 13%, P = .002), being infected with COVID-19 from the vaccine (10% vs. 5%, P = 0.008), and worry about misinformation/political agenda (43% vs. 31%, P = 0.003). Younger respondents and medical personnel were more likely to be concerned about long-term side effects and vaccine effectiveness, and the younger group was also more likely to be concerned about pregnancy/breastfeeding issues and worry about misinformation/political agenda. Age (younger vs. older, odds ratio 2.15) and occupation (medical vs. non-medical, odds ratio 3.74) were independent risk factors for vaccine hesitancy. The NVH group was more likely to recommend the COVID-19 vaccine to a friend or family member than the VH group (93% vs. 20%, P < .001) as were the older age group (79% vs. 67%, P = .001) and non-medical personnel (81% vs. 52%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Younger age and medical occupation were independent risk factors for vaccine hesitancy and these individuals were less likely to recommend vaccination to a friend or family member. We also identified several key concerns related to vaccination hesitancy, in particular those related to short- and long-term side effects, and the spread of misinformation. Among military personnel, these findings carry important implications that may negatively impact mission readiness, a matter that merits further investigation. Our COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy findings can be used to guide targeted interventions at future vaccination campaigns in a military population.

Battlefield acupuncture appears to be an effective therapy for pain management.

INTRODUCTION: The Department of Defense has been training primary care providers in battlefield acupuncture (BFA), a subtype of auricular acupuncture, as an adjunct therapy for pain management. METHODS: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of BFA for pain management in an outpatient Internal Medicine clinic staffed by resident physicians. The target population for this single-center prospective cohort study were military beneficiaries at a medical treatment facility located at the Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. Participants who met inclusion criteria were treated with BFA in addition to routine standard care for pain (n = 69). The control group was composed of participants who received routine standard care only without BFA (n = 27). Pain was assessed by a self-reported pain scale (0-10) at the time of encounter, immediately after BFA (for the intervention group), then at 24 and 48 h afterwards. RESULTS: Mean pain for the intervention group decreased from 5.45 before BFA to 3.29 immediately following BFA to 2.21 at 24 h and to 2.10 at 48 h (p < 0.001). Thus, at all three post-treatment time points, mean decrease in pain surpassed a two-point reduction, deemed to be a clinically important difference. The BFA group had a greater reduction in pain compared to the no intervention group at 24 h (3.14 vs 0.59, p < 0.001) and at 48 h (3.26 vs 0.96, p < 0.001). Four intervention group participants (6%) reported an adverse reaction (three with pain at the insertion site) or complication (one with superficial infection). CONCLUSION: BFA provided by Internal Medicine residents appears to be a safe and effective adjunct therapy for pain management in an outpatient setting, but requires further validation by randomized controlled trials.

Impact of an Education Intervention on COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in a Military Base Population.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine hesitancy is a major impediment to achieving herd immunity and overcoming the current pandemic. Our aim was to decrease the prevalence of vaccine hesitancy through an education intervention. METHOD: An education intervention, consisting of a PowerPoint presentation addressing the two mRNA COVID-19 vaccine concerns/myths and a question and answer panel comprising health care providers from various specialties, was implemented to address vaccine hesitancy among personnel associated with Wright-Patterson Air Force Base through a series of virtual and in-person seminars. Participants completed a post-seminar survey as a retrospective self-assessment to identify attitudes and views surrounding vaccine hesitancy and the impact of the education intervention. Chi-squared test was used to examine relationships between categorical variables, and multiple logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for vaccine hesitancy pre- and post-seminar. All analyses were done using SPSS Statistics Version 25.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY). Institutional Review Board approval was not obtained before this study as it began as a non-research initiative and received non-research determination post hoc. RESULTS: Five hundred participants completed the survey. Mean age was 44.7 years with 13.4 and 86.6% medical and non-medical personnel, respectively. Nearly all (98.8%) had not received their first shot of the vaccine series. 402 (80.9%) were receptive to vaccination, and 95 (19.1%) were hesitant post-seminar. Of the 139 participants who reported they were initially hesitant after our intervention, 50 (36%) indicated that they were now receptive to the vaccine, while 89 (64%) remained hesitant. Of those 50, 48 (96%) had moderate to great amount of trust in COVID-19 vaccine information presented by physicians/other providers. Six respondents who wanted the vaccine before the intervention no longer wanted the vaccine. A medical occupation (OR = 4.85, 95% CI = 2.63-8.96, P < .001), little or no trust in COVID-19 vaccine information from physicians/other providers (OR = 19.48, 95% CI = 7.31-51.90, P < 0.001), and being age 30 or younger (OR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.02-3.2, P = 0.041) were independent predictors of vaccine hesitancy. Trust in providers was a significant factor in change of intent from vaccine hesitant to receptive post-intervention (OR 0.13, 95% CI = 0.03-0.59, P = .008). Age and occupation were not significant factors associated with change in intent. CONCLUSION: Our education intervention was effective in reducing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in a military base population. Study limitations include applications toward other military and non-military populations, the possibility of nonresponse bias, and absence of prior validated interventions. Area for future studies includes improvement upon educational intervention, development of other effective methods, and application of intervention in other populations.

Increasing exercise adherence among elderly patients with chronic disease in primary care: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Currently, the evidence for exercise in maintaining health, well-being, and physical functioning is overwhelming. Despite these benefits, more than 50% of the population fails to meet the recommended exercise requirements for age and health status. In our study, we sought to provide a method to increase exercise adherence that was both effective and time-efficient for physicians and their patients. METHODS: The primary objective of this research study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a graded exercise protocol and biweekly monitoring on increasing the duration of aerobic exercise to 150 min per week in a population of elderly individuals with chronic disease. Secondarily, we evaluated for improvement in resting heart rate, blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), and cardiorespiratory fitness. The overall study design was a randomized, prospective cohort study with assessor blinding. Forty-five patients aged ≥60 years with multiple comorbidities were recruited from the Internal Medicine Clinic at Wright-Patterson AFB. Participants were randomized into a treatment or control arm and observed over a period of 34 weeks. Those in the treatment arm were given a graded walking protocol and received biweekly phone calls to evaluate compliance. Those in the control arm did not receive an intervention or biweekly monitoring. Measurements of heart rate, blood pressure, and BMI were taken quarterly in both groups. At the beginning and conclusion of the study, each participant completed a modified Balke treadmill test and Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE). Continuous variables were evaluated with the independent samples t-test, whereas categorical variables were evaluated with the chi-squared test. RESULTS: A greater percentage of the treatment group achieved the primary outcome (41.6% vs. 0%; p = 0.003). Those in the treatment group also had favorable improvements in heart rate response (- 2.4 beats/min vs. + 5.3 beats/min; p = 0.038) and PASE (+ 66 vs.-20; p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between groups for mean change in heart rate, blood pressure, or BMI. CONCLUSION: Guided, independent exercise and surveillance can be an effective tool in primary care practice to help patients reach the recommended levels of exercise for both age and health status.

Acute Right Ventricular Dysfunction Secondary to Hereditary Angioedema Exacerbation.

This is a case report of a 31-year-old woman with past medical history of hereditary angioedema (HAE) who developed acute right ventricular dysfunction. The patient presented to the emergency department with complaints of acute abdominal pain and swelling. Her electrocardiogram demonstrated sinus tachycardia and T wave inversion in leads V1-V3, otherwise without findings suggestive of ischemia. Troponin was elevated at 1.83 ng/mL. A transthoracic echocardiogram showed normal left ventricular function with ejection fraction of 65-70%, but the right ventricle (RV) was dilated and severely hypokinetic and there was moderate tricuspid regurgitation. Patient was managed symptomatically for her HAE exacerbation. Her abdominal swelling resolved, troponins continued to trend down, and she was discharged home after three days. A follow up echocardiogram done six months later demonstrated normal RV function.

Ruptured Renal Abscess From Streptococcus agalactiae Invasion in a Postpartum Female.

Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B Streptococcus or GBS)is an exceptionally rare causative organism of a ruptured renal abscess. We report a case of this normally commensal organism causing a large ruptured renal abscess in a 17-year-old postpartum female. Although S. agalactiae is known to cause postpartum neonatal morbidity and mortality, it has rarely caused invasive infections in the last 20 years in adults. While this diagnosis often presents with nonspecific findings that can easily be overlooked during the postpartum period, the patient responded well to the established treatment of broad-spectrum antibiotics and a percutaneous drain.

Prevasculitic Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis.

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is an exceptionally rare systemic necrotizing vasculitis. The disease is clinically characterized by asthma with concomitant blood and tissue eosinophilia, often progressing to eosinophilic vasculitis. From the onset of asthma, there is usually a three to nine year delay of EGPA diagnosis. We report a case of this highly uncommon disease identified in an early stage.

Scurvy: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Scurvy is a rare disease which can manifest in a variety of presentations. Classically, scurvy is associated with poor dentition and bleeding diatheses. Rarely, scurvy can present with life-threatening hemodynamical instability. Herein, we report the case of a 69-year-old female with a history of hypertension and depression who presented with four months of weakness and a 20-pound weight loss. Her presentation was complicated by lower extremity bruising and myalgias over the last three weeks. The patient's blood pressure in the emergency department was 86/54 mmHg. On further examination, she had poor dentition and extensive ecchymoses in different stages of resolution over her posterior thighs and calves. The patient was also noted to have perifollicular hemorrhages. An ascorbic acid level was checked and the result was 0.0 mg/dL (normal range: 0.4 to 2.0 mg/dL). During her admission, she slowly improved with a provided diet and multivitamins. Her blood pressure consistently remained over 120/65 mmHg. The patient was advised to adjust her diet and take supplemental ascorbic acid. On a follow-up visit two weeks later, the patient endorsed an improvement in pain and exercise tolerance and was noted to have marked improvement in skin findings.  Ascorbic acid is an essential piece of multiple biochemical pathways. Humans are required to attain ascorbic acid from their diet. People who consume diets lacking in ascorbic acid develop scurvy.